HUCK digital archive

Huck magazine

UK Uncut ‘Pay Day’ protests

Peaceful demonstrations targeting tax dodgers.

Photography Nicholas Adams
Written by
Posted 12:27 GMT on December 16, 2010 Comments (1)
UK Uncut ‘Pay Day’ protests

Campaign group UK Uncut are staging many protests across the UK as part of their Pay Day mass action on December 18.

The protesters contest that the government's cuts - currently affecting the poorest and most vulnerable members of society - could be avoided if wealthy organisations such as Vodafone were forced to declare their offshore bank accounts and pay their fair share of tax.

Peaceful direct actions will be happening everywhere including such places as Aberystwyth, Truro and Dundee and will include flash mobs, superglue stick-ons and good old picketing.

UK Uncut are "an army of citizen volunteers determined to make wealthy tax avoiders pay" and have garnered support from notable activists including Johann Hari.

Subscribe to HUCK for six issues
Only £21 (UK) / £44 (EU) / £59 (Rest of the World).

Creative Commons LicenseUK Uncut ‘Pay Day’ protests (text) by Shelley Lee Jones is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

Comments (1)

  • Here is how the scam works.

    Companies that operate in the UK pay tax upon their UK profits, they pay VAT, they pay national insurance on their UK staff's salaries and those staff pay income tax. They will pay local business rates on their premises.

    Where the company is headquartered if it is a multinational determines what happens to their earnings once taken out of each country they do business in. It is generally a good thing to have multinational headquarters as you will gain extra tax revenue, but also because they use lots of other expensive goods and services, and employ the well paid staff. If the headquarters of a firm is in the UK then they will likely use a UK law firm, a UK accountant, UK IT consultants etc etc

    The issue many people have is with tax rules that basically allow you to massively reduce your tax liability in the UK (and elsewhere) by various methods, often involving loans. Loan interest payments aren't taxed (quite sensibly) but this can be abused by using an offshore headquarters. So the owning company is based in the British Virgin Islands "lends" lots money to its UK subsidiary which makes regular interest payments back to the owning company. Those interest payments happen to coincide with the profits the British subsidiary makes, which basically reduces its profits to 0 and therefore reduces its tax liability massively. The BVI company has very healthy profits but in a country that doesn't tax them. It gets much more complicated but that is basically the idea. Google "sold" various technology rights to their European subsidiaries and receive interest payments back, hence their low tax rate.

    The real kicker is that these Headquarters that are making all the profits and pay zero tax are often held under nominee directorships, so you cannot find out the real private owners..

    The bank address for the offshore Headquarters company can be anywhere. It does not have to also be in the off shore country.
    The company nominee directors have direct access to this bank account to do what they want.
    This is because the offshore havens do not require the accounts to be audited or even for accounted to be submitted in general.

    Ironically the "EU Tax savings directive" passed in 2008 stopped the ability of private individuals to do this. They did this by forcing all countries banks to expose all persons accounts everywhere to the other governments. This was lead by the main progressive tax countries of course to stop personal tax liabilities moving off shore and to avoid paying tax in high tax countries.
    Just what companies are stil allowed to do.

    Its painfully ironic what is going on. Think about the scale of the damage this causes to all of society and the ripple effects it has and its staggering.

    Talk to any London accountant you have known for 5 or more years and they will tell you this in detail. If you don't have a long standing relationship with them then they are unlikely to discuss this dirty laundry with you.

    ggg - March 3, 2011, 00:28 / Report abuse

Please note: Your comment may be held in moderation for approval by an administrator to prevent spamming. This usually doesn't take long, please be patient.

Follow HUCK on Twitter

Huck Newsletter Sign up for our updates

Pop your email address in the box below to receive exclusive updates, offers and competitions.

Blog categories

Recent comments

  • Great article Ted. Hector, the reason we must always be sympathetic to the 'white on non-white' race issue is because...
Mary on On racism
  • Poor stab at the race issue, and completely contradictory. On one hand, there's the "race has changed, stereotypical ra...
Hector on On racism
  • He was a great artist. Thanks for the tribute Vince....
  • As someone born in the early 80's who owned bought music on cassette, the recent resurgence in audio cassettes and audio...
Shotgunsprayer on Kissability
  • Really enjoyed the video Micky, makes me miss the good old days of surfing heaps....

Most viewed this month on HUCK

  1. Thomas Campbell x HUCK Flowers comp Blog: Thomas Campbell x HUCK Flowers comp
  2. Siren ‘The Surrender’ video Blog: Siren ‘The Surrender’ video
  3. Oh no, it’s Odd Future Columns: Oh no, it’s Odd Future
  4. HUCK#031 Digital Edition Blog: HUCK#031 Digital Edition
  5. Jamie Thomas Features: Jamie Thomas When Time Stands Still
  6. Thomas Campbell Features: Thomas Campbell Um... Duh... Yeah
  7. Danny Way Features: Danny Way Not a Stuntman
  8. Adam Yauch: We Will Miss You Features: Adam Yauch: We Will Miss You