HUCK digital archive

Huck magazine

Ruth Carruthers

Ruth Carruthers: Car troubles

The beauty of nature is very enticing but do you really have to use a car to enjoy it?

Posted 10:34 GMT on January 13, 2011 Comments (3)

I wish I had a car. As an environmentalist, I’m probably not suppose to say that out loud but it’s true. Moreover, I wish I had my own set of wheels right now so I could escape Glasgow in all its grey glory.

If I had it my way, the first weeks of the year for me would look like the Howies winter catalogue: all beaches, blankets and riding mountains. But instead they always end up resembling something more like student life: watching telly and eating tinned custard. These are wasted days for me.

But it’s not just now that I feel this way. I have burst of frustration throughout the year, mainly when the sun is at its zenith or there’s snow on the hills and I want to enjoy nature at its best. Not being able to enjoy the beauty of these wild places is the one thing that stings the most for me.

I hate to give in though. I’ve always believed that by driving to the beach or mountains, you are inadvertently spoiling what you came to enjoy, both directly through the building of roads and indirectly through pollution and consumption of natural resources. 'I don’t want to get a car until I can afford to own an environmentally responsible one,' I used to say, sounding sickeningly righteous I’m sure. But there’s only so far my legs and a bike can take me in a day, and any car I own would have to be big enough to fit a board or two – not one of those wee eco-friendly Smart Cars, that’s for sure.

So what do I do? Save up for a regular petrol or diesel car and suppress my guilt? Wait 10 years until I can afford an eco-friendly model? Catch public transport to the mountains? Apply to the Protest Fund? Look into converting an engine to run on chip fat? Or maybe join a car-pooling scheme?

The last suggestion sounds sensible both for my pocket and the environment. It’s just that carpooling to the mountains or beach from the city on a regular basis is seldom viable. It sounds great in theory and it's good for getting to work, school or taking a long trip to the Alps. In practice though, it's like waiting for the stars to align when a car owner and I both have some free time and the urge for the same adventure.

I did get public transport up to the Cairngorms once. By the time I caught a bus, a train then another bus, I arrived on the hill at 1pm, leaving me approximately three and a half hours before the mountain closed. I’m not going to tear public transport apart here. Sure it’s often under-developed, expensive and unreliable, but it brings people together and should be one of the best solutions to our problems. After all, isn’t protecting the environment a collective challenge? Cars are insular and keep us apart – another reason not to get one maybe? Perhaps if more people used public transport, we would realise that we are all in this together?

But the crux of the matter is that unless you live on the shore by a break or under the shadow mountain, you are never going to find those sweet spots without a car.

Subscribe to HUCK for six issues
Only £21 (UK) / £44 (EU) / £59 (Rest of the World).

Comments (3)

  • If I had that much wilderness lying tantalisingly close then I'd buy a car. Sounds like you need it for your board as well. The problem with cars is the masses using them habitually for journeys that could be made by other means, and the whole urban system is subservient to them. As long as you drive respectfully and don't tear up the countryside off road then it doesn't seem a big deal in the grand scheme of things.

    Lenny - January 15, 2011, 00:03 / Report abuse
  • Great column Ruth. Lenny seems to have hit the nail on the head. The green movement has been forced, I think, into oversimplifying its arguments and demonising certain things as being 'not green'. Hence cars are bad, buses are good; planes are bad, trains are good etc, when in fact these issues are much more complex. Largely, I think, that's because the mainstream media has demanded a really simple narrative - which is why I love that Huck discusses this stuff in more detail. Unless we want a planet that, in a couple of generations time, resembles a wasteland, we'll have to cut down on carbon intensive activities - driving included. But a green future doesn't mean no fun at all. Four mates in an efficient car, hired from a car pool, running on green fuel, driven sensibly is fine once in a while - what ever the Clarksonesque scaremongers might say! It's some people's insistence that they have the 'right' to haul several tons of 4x4 as fast as they can down clogged city streets, with billions spent on roads and parking infrastructure so they can do it (while simultaneously moaning that they're expected to pay for it through petrol taxes) that's got to go.

    Olly - January 17, 2011, 12:36 / Report abuse
  • This is a great article Ruth and something that I often think about.

    As a Londonder who surfs but can't drive a lot of my time is spent making my way down to Cornwall. This often involves, one tube journey, one train ride, two buses and an up-hill walk to even get close to where I want to be (camping kit and surf gear in tow) and I can't help thinking that the surf tastes all the sweeter for my troubles.

    Perhaps then the question that has to be asked (and probably has been) is are we a society that craves immediacy too much in all that we do, especially with regards to travel? Have we forgotten what it is to have to take our time and that humble feeling of having to spend a whole day traveling by various means to get to our goal? For sure, I don't deny it would be great to drive, own a car and be able to scream down motorways and A roads and be at my destination in half the time and yes public transport is shoddy at the best of times, but I think it would be a great thing if there could be a collective shift in how we approach and think about the way we move from A-to-B especially from those who rely on mother nature for their leisure.

    However, unfortunately Olly is right in that the issues are much more complex than this and not everyone is able to adapt in such a way, practically or financially.

    So where can we go from here as whilst not exactly tangible the benefits are there in the potential good feeling that you can find and the people you may meet along the way?

    Alexander Wood - January 22, 2011, 10:14 / Report abuse

Please note: Your comment may be held in moderation for approval by an administrator to prevent spamming. This usually doesn't take long, please be patient.

Follow HUCK on Twitter

Huck Newsletter Sign up for our updates

Pop your email address in the box below to receive exclusive updates, offers and competitions.

Recent comments

  • Hi Jon, I'm aware that white males make up a small percentage of the global population. I was just observing that they d...
Mary on Racism?
  • “The media is in a unique position to do this but instead all it does is simplify. All it gives us is black and white, g...
Jon on Racism?
  • The NUJ recommends all media interns get paid minimum wage for their time. I hope Relentless see the wisdom in this, oth...
  • Great article Ted. Hector, the reason we must always be sympathetic to the 'white on non-white' race issue is because...
Mary on Racism?
  • Poor stab at the race issue, and completely contradictory. On one hand, there's the "race has changed, stereotypical ra...
Hector on Racism?

Most viewed this month on HUCK

  1. Thomas Campbell x HUCK Flowers comp Blog: Thomas Campbell x HUCK Flowers comp
  2. Siren ‘The Surrender’ video Blog: Siren ‘The Surrender’ video
  3. HUCK#031 Digital Edition Blog: HUCK#031 Digital Edition
  4. Jamie Thomas Features: Jamie Thomas When Time Stands Still
  5. Thomas Campbell Features: Thomas Campbell Um... Duh... Yeah
  6. Danny Way Features: Danny Way Not a Stuntman
  7. Adam Yauch Features: Adam Yauch We Will Miss You
  8. Jack O’Neill Features: Jack O’Neill Material Man