<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eco overload</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.huckmagazine.com/features/eco-overload/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.huckmagazine.com/features/eco-overload/</link>
	<description>HUCK is a bi-monthly lifestyle magazine rooted in surf, skate and snowboarding.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:33:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alistair Stewart</title>
		<link>http://www.huckmagazine.com/features/eco-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-37927</link>
		<dc:creator>Alistair Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.huckmagazine.com/?p=11088#comment-37927</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t disagree with that, I was just thinking while reading that &quot;eco driving&quot; could easily mean &quot;economical driving&quot;, and it may have been the original meaning. I accept that the creators of the phrase will have been aware of the homonym though, and most people will take eco to mean &quot;ecological&quot; anyway, so I suppose it does qualify as greenwash no matter what.

The DSA website calls it &quot;eco safe driving&quot;, which is unambiguous and of course completely stupid - there is of course no such thing (yet).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px; display:block; width:48px' ><img alt='' src='http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/7e274e77a5e1cb8b6030510641ea5141?s=48&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D48&amp;r=PG' class='avatar avatar-48 photo' height='48' width='48' /></span>I don't disagree with that, I was just thinking while reading that "eco driving" could easily mean "economical driving", and it may have been the original meaning. I accept that the creators of the phrase will have been aware of the homonym though, and most people will take eco to mean "ecological" anyway, so I suppose it does qualify as greenwash no matter what.</p>
<p>The DSA website calls it "eco safe driving", which is unambiguous and of course completely stupid - there is of course no such thing (yet).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurlspam</title>
		<link>http://www.huckmagazine.com/features/eco-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-37894</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurlspam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.huckmagazine.com/?p=11088#comment-37894</guid>
		<description>Alistair - would it not have been more constructive to engage in the point Ruth&#039;s making, rather than just wiki-slapping her?

The point she&#039;s making is an important one: the more phrases like &quot;eco-this&quot; and &quot;enviro-that&quot; are bandied around in the wrong way, the more people will become overwhelmed with misinformation and greenwash.

These nifty little phrases may help some people sleep better at night, by lulling them into the belief that they&#039;re, like, so &quot;eco&quot; and &quot;ethical&quot; and whatnot - but truth be told, greenwash does exactly what it says on the tin: washes away anything green, by watering down the efforts of people who are actually out there sparking real change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px; display:block; width:48px' ><img alt='' src='http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9f765b3b91b659baae898a9407cc8c42?s=48&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D48&amp;r=PG' class='avatar avatar-48 photo' height='48' width='48' /></span>Alistair - would it not have been more constructive to engage in the point Ruth's making, rather than just wiki-slapping her?</p>
<p>The point she's making is an important one: the more phrases like "eco-this" and "enviro-that" are bandied around in the wrong way, the more people will become overwhelmed with misinformation and greenwash.</p>
<p>These nifty little phrases may help some people sleep better at night, by lulling them into the belief that they're, like, so "eco" and "ethical" and whatnot - but truth be told, greenwash does exactly what it says on the tin: washes away anything green, by watering down the efforts of people who are actually out there sparking real change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruth Carruthers</title>
		<link>http://www.huckmagazine.com/features/eco-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-37884</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruth Carruthers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.huckmagazine.com/?p=11088#comment-37884</guid>
		<description>Well not according to my driving instructor or my official DSA book, and although useful, I don&#039;t particularly value Wiki as the most credible reference point out there I&#039;m afraid.  But your point only adds to my argument Alistair, this is a confusing state of affairs and we shouldn&#039;t use the work eco lightly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px; display:block; width:48px' ><img alt='' src='http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/dd7fcae8a4aec355e6888b93b7b90672?s=48&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D48&amp;r=PG' class='avatar avatar-48 photo' height='48' width='48' /></span>Well not according to my driving instructor or my official DSA book, and although useful, I don't particularly value Wiki as the most credible reference point out there I'm afraid.  But your point only adds to my argument Alistair, this is a confusing state of affairs and we shouldn't use the work eco lightly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alistair Stewart</title>
		<link>http://www.huckmagazine.com/features/eco-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-37805</link>
		<dc:creator>Alistair Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.huckmagazine.com/?p=11088#comment-37805</guid>
		<description>&quot;eco-driving&quot; actually means &quot;economic driving&quot; ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eco-driving )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px; display:block; width:48px' ><img alt='' src='http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/7e274e77a5e1cb8b6030510641ea5141?s=48&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D48&amp;r=PG' class='avatar avatar-48 photo' height='48' width='48' /></span>"eco-driving" actually means "economic driving" ( <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eco-driving" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E.....driving</a> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

